Comparatives, superlatives and comparison language
Accurate comparison structures for charts and arguments, including twice as many, the same as, and the degree adverbs that qualify them.
- Marking criterion
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy and Lexical Resource
- Where it pays off
- Writing Task 1 · Writing Task 2 · Speaking Part 3
Task 1 is fundamentally a comparison task, and Part 3 questions constantly ask you to compare groups, periods or countries. A handful of structures cover almost every comparison you will need, and the errors are predictable enough to eliminate.
The core structures
Learn each as a full pattern rather than as an isolated word.
- Comparative plus than: 'Rail use was higher than bus use.'
- As + adjective + as for equality: 'Spending was almost as high as in 2001.'
- Not as + adjective + as for inequality: 'Spending was not as high as in 2001.'
- The + superlative: 'Germany recorded the steepest decline.'
- Multiples: 'twice as many students as', 'three times higher than', 'half as much as'.
- The same as, similar to, in line with, in contrast to.
- Formal alternatives to 'than' when comparing figures: in comparison with, as compared with, as against, as opposed to. 'Profits reached $404 million, as against $310 million a year earlier.'
Degree adverbs that sharpen comparison
These add precision and range at once, and examiners notice them.
- Small differences: slightly, marginally, a little.
- Middling differences: moderately, modestly.
- Large differences: considerably, significantly, substantially.
- Very large differences: far, vastly, dramatically, by a wide margin.
- Place them before the comparative: 'considerably higher than', 'marginally lower than'.
Form rules
One and two syllable adjectives behave differently from longer ones.
- One syllable: add -er and -est. High, higher, highest.
- Two syllables ending in -y: change to -ier and -iest. Easy, easier, easiest.
- Three or more syllables: use more and most. Significant, more significant, most significant.
- Irregular forms: good, better, best; bad, worse, worst; far, further, furthest.
- Never double up: 'more higher' and 'most highest' are wrong.
Comparing like with like
The most common logical error in Task 1 is comparing a figure with a category.
- Wrong: 'The figure for France was higher than Germany.'
- Right: 'The figure for France was higher than that for Germany.'
- Right: 'France recorded a higher figure than Germany.'
- Use 'that' for a singular noun and 'those' for a plural one.
Corrected examples
Incorrect: The population of Tokyo is more bigger than the population of Osaka.
Correct: The population of Tokyo is considerably larger than that of Osaka.
No double comparative, and 'that of' keeps the comparison parallel.
Incorrect: Twice more people used the library in 2010 than 2000.
Correct: Twice as many people used the library in 2010 as in 2000.
Multiples take the 'as many as' pattern, not 'more than'.
Incorrect: Spending in the UK was not so high as Spain.
Correct: Spending in the UK was not as high as in Spain.
Use 'as ... as' in the negative comparison and keep both sides parallel.
Quick checklist
- Never combine 'more' with an -er ending.
- Use 'that of' or 'those of' to compare figures, not places.
- Multiples use 'twice as many as', not 'twice more than'.
- Add a degree adverb to show the size of the difference.
Apply it to a real response and check the length and structure.
Open the writing checklist